SANDRP Blog IMD’s River Basin Rainfall Maps Useful But Needs Improvement We have noticed during just concluded South West monsoon season that IMD has started a new and welcome feature in rainfall data reporting. The Data is available in maps, on daily, weekly and seasonal basis. We are not sure when this practice started, we noticed it only during 2016 monsoon season. This is most welcome development, since getting rainfall data at basin level is most appropriate and useful, since basin is the hydrological unit that will experience the impact of rainfall or lack of rainfall in the basin, in form of floods or droughts. There a number of limitations as of now. We hope IMD will take necessary steps to remove these limitations and improve the availability and access of basin wise rainfall maps and data in coming years.
Continue reading “DRP: 17 Oct 2016 (IMD’s River Basin Rainfall Maps Useful But Needs Improvement)”Tag: Water
DRP: 3 Oct 2016 (Role of Uttarakhand Hydro Projects in Kedarnath Disaster 2013)
Book Review: Rage of the Rivers: Role of Uttarakhand hydro projects in Kedarnath disaster 2013 by Hridayesh Joshi Rage of the River reads not unlike a gripping thriller. Thing is, it is not fiction. It is a true ‘story’ of a cataclysmic event, exacerbated by greed, and twisted notions of development manifested in blasting fragile hills, tunneling rivers, denuding forests, and encouraging illegal encroachments and mindless construction and tourism infrastructure. This is an important chronicle of one of the worst disasters of our times. Joshi has thoroughly analysed the role of endless, ill-planned hydel projects, but inexplicably fails to take into account the wreckage wrought by unrestrained tourism. Joshi points a finger at the unethical practices of construction companies, contractors and operators of hydel dam projects, even in the face of this monumental disaster. The officials of the Vishnuprayag project refused to listen to the pleas of the villagers to open the dam gates and allow the excess water to flow safely from under the barrage. The advice was ignored, either in ignorance of the gravity of the situation, or with an eye on the opportunity to generate more power. The rising waters broke the barrage flooding the valley and its villages.
Continue reading “DRP: 3 Oct 2016 (Role of Uttarakhand Hydro Projects in Kedarnath Disaster 2013)”
शौचालयी स्वच्छता से संपूर्ण शुचिता की ओर-2 (जल-थल-मल पुस्तक सारांश)
आज गॉधी जंयती है और स्व्च्छ भारत अभियान को भी दो वर्ष पूरे हो गए हैं। दो दिन पूर्व, 30 सितम्बर को इंडोसैन समारोह का उद्घाटन करते हुए प्रधानमंत्री श्री नरेन्द्र मोदी जी ने देश को स्वच्छ बनाने के लिए स्वच्छाग्रह चलाने का मंत्र किया है। स्वच्छ भारत मिशन के तहत आयोजित इस समारोह में उन्होंने सीमित संदर्भ में ही सही दो ओर बड़ी अच्छी बातें कहीं, एक स्वच्छता को लेकर हमें अपने आचरण में बदलाव लाना चाहिए और दूसरा जैविक कूडे़ कचरे से खाद बनायी जा सकती है। दूसरी ओर शहरी विकास मंत्री वैंकया नायडू के अनुसार देश में 1 लाख से ज्यादा गॉव खुले में शौच से मुक्त हो गए हैं।
भारत के पहले प्रधानमंत्री श्री जवाहरलाल नेहरू ने भी एक बार कहा था कि जब तक भारत में सब लोगों के पास शौचालय सुविधा उपलब्ध नहीं होती, वो तब तक भारत को आज़ाद नहीं मानेगे। इसी प्रंसग में राष्ट्रपिता महात्मा गॉधी जी का भी जिक्र अनायास हो आता है जिंहोने सैनिटेशन को आजादी से भी बढ़कर बताया और मैला प्रथा के विरोध में सब मानवों को अपने मैले का निपटान खुद करने के लिए भी कहा।
Continue reading “शौचालयी स्वच्छता से संपूर्ण शुचिता की ओर-2 (जल-थल-मल पुस्तक सारांश)”
शौचालय निर्माण से शुचिता की ओर-1 (जल-थल-मल पुस्तक समीक्षा)
खुले में शौच की आदत से निजात दिलाने के लिए केन्द्र सरकार शौचालय बनाने का काम 1980 के दशक से लेकर अब तक चलाती आ रही है। 1999 में इस अभियान का नाम टोटल सैनिटेशन कैंपेन और 2013 में निर्मल भारत अभियान हो गया। आज इसे स्वच्छ भारत अभियान के नाम से जाना जाता है। बदले नाम के साथ हाल में स्वच्छ भारत मिशन भी 2019 तक भारत को खुले में शौच से मुक्त कराने का बीड़ा उठाए हुए है। ऐसा करने वाले गाॅवों का निर्मल ग्राम पुरस्कार भी दिया जा रहा है। 2003 से लेकर अबतक करीब 28 हजार से ज्यादा गाॅवों को इस ईनाम से नवाजा जा चुका है।
सरकारी आॅकड़ो के मुताबिक देश में 10 में से 3 व्यक्ति आज भी खुले में ही शौच जाते हैं। जो सरकार के लिए अतंर्राष्ट्रीय स्तर पर बड़ी शर्मिंदगी का विषय है। सयुक्त राष्ट्र के अनुसार गरीबी में भारत से निचले पायदानों पर खडे़ देश नेपाल, पाकिस्तान, बांग्लादेश आदि पडौसी मुल्क शौचालय बनाने में भारत से कहीं आगे निकल गए हैं।
केंद्रीय पेयजल और स्वच्छता मंत्रालय के अनुसार इस अभियान के तहत अब तक 8 करोड़ 7 लाख शौचालय बनाए गए हैं। यानी 12 करोड़ 5 लाख शौचालयों के लक्ष्य का 70 फीसदी बन चुके हैं। परंतु 2011 की जनगणना के हिसाब से महज 5 करोड़ 16 लाख शौचालय ही पाए गए। मामला साफ है शौचालय ज़मी पर कम और कागज़ों में ज्यादा बने। 2008 के सर्वे में बड़ा खुलासा हुआ की 132 निर्मल गाॅव ईनाम पाने वाले में से केवल 6 गाॅव ऐसे निकले जिनमें कोई भी खुले में पखाना नहीं जाता था। योजना आयोग द्वारा तैयार 2013 की रपट इससे अधिक दिलचस्प है जो बताती है 73 फीसदी शौचालयवाले घरों में अब भी कम से कम एक सदस्य खुले में ही शौच जाता है।
इन सब के बीच प्रश्न उठता है, क्या शौचालय बनाना ही सैनिटेशन है और क्या मात्र शौचालय बनाने से ही भारत स्वच्छ हो जाएगा ? कहीं शौच मुक्त भारत के लक्ष्य का पीछा करते हम लोग प्राकृतिक संसाधनों का नाजायज दोहन और प्रदूषण तो नहीं कर रहे हैं ? मानव मल का प्रकृति और माटी से क्या संबंध है ? कहीं मात्र शौचालयी स्वच्छता के कारण ही तो पानी की बर्बादी और नदियों का प्रदूषण नहीं बढ़ रहा है? मल के जल और थल से बिखरे संबंधों से फिर रूबरू कराते हुए इन्हीं सब सवालों का जवाब तलाशती है, सोपान जोशी द्वारा लिखित जल-थल और मल पुस्तक!
Continue reading “शौचालय निर्माण से शुचिता की ओर-1 (जल-थल-मल पुस्तक समीक्षा)”
DRP: 26 Sep 2016 (Victory to tribals protest; Jispa HEP calls back staff)
Finally, tribals struggle wins, sends Jispa HEP company packing up Facing stiff opposition from the tribal community against the construction of 300 MW Jispa Dam in Lahaul-Spiti valley has forced the Himachal Pradesh Power Corportaion Ltd (HPPCL) to suspend the project for the time being. The dam which was declared a project of national importance now has residents from 14 villages oppose it. HPPCL has invested Rs 3 crore and has stated that it would begin study work only when locals extend their support.
Since 2009, people from the Todh valley in Lahaul-Spiti district were opposing the Jispa Dam project proposed over Bhaga river, a tributarJy of Chenab at Jispa village. The government had sanctioned Rs 7,000 crore for this project but local residents did not allow officials to work in smoothly for three years now.
Confirming the development, managing director, HPPCL, D K Sharma told that some people were continuously opposing the project without realizing that construction of project could have ushered development in the area. He said constant opposition of local people had resulted into wastage of limited human resource so HPPCL board had decided to withdraw the manpower as project was only at investigation stage.
Continue reading “DRP: 26 Sep 2016 (Victory to tribals protest; Jispa HEP calls back staff)”
DRP: 19 Sep 2016
EAC Panel Visiting the site in Dec 2015
Centre EAC defers clearance to Yadadri Power project The Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) under the Ministry of Environment has deferred its decision for granting environmental clearance for the 8,000 MW Yadadri Thermal Power Station in Telangana by TSGENCO due to a “lackadaisical” approach in preparing documentation. The EAC said the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report was incomplete and there was lack of clarity on many issues raised by the Committee earlier. EAC on Thermal Power Companies has in its minutes meeting held on 29-30 2016 held the EIA consultants guilty of cut & paste jobs which can be found here. At some places, it is mentioned that coal will be transported from two ports and in some other places, four ports are mentioned. Hence, complete and specific details regarding coal import ports and coal transportation routes were not given. Further it is also observed that two important sections of the EIA report- “risk assessment” and “disaster management plan”- are almost entirely generic and contain hardly any site or project specific aspects.
Continue reading “DRP: 19 Sep 2016”
DRP: 16 Aug 2016 (When shall We Start Respecting Our Rivers & Provide Space to Them)
In absence of clear and strict laws to define the rivers zone and demarcate flood plains, our rivers are increasingly becoming subject to exploitation. When the river spaces of our National River Ganga & Yamuna River which flow through National Capital are not well protected, then the plight of other rivers across country can be understood.
This week, there are two news reports which again are highlighting this cause. Interestingly in both cases, legal fight is going on in green tribunal which indirectly deals with the issue though with no success so far. In fist case, NGT has directed Govt. of Uttarakhand to demarcate floodplains of Ganga river from its origin in Gomukh till Roorkee, a 65-km long stretch in the state. The tribunal has posted the matter for the next hearing on Oct 20 and asked the state government to submit its compliance report by then. The bench also sought a report on the total number of hotels on the 65-km stretch from the govt. The green panel allowed the state govt to take the help of Roorkee-based National Institute of Hydrology for identification of flood plains. Construction on flood plains and inside river zones is a sure invitation to disaster such as Kedar Nath Floods in 2013 when human made infrastructures erected very much inside river zones were raised down like sand dunes by enraged rivers. It is sad and even more worrisome that we have learnt nothing from such events.
In second incident Govt. of Uttar Pradesh has drawn green tribunal’s ire over constructions in floodplains. The apex court for environmental issues, expressed its dissatisfaction over the manner in which State Govt filed its report on the distance of various real estate projects from the Yamuna flood plain zone in the city. Coming down heavily in the state govt and various Agra authorities, Agra Development Authority (ADA) & irrigation department, it stated that “authorities were expected to act fairly and judicially while complying with its directions.” The tribunal appointed registrar general Mukesh Kumar Gupta as local commissioner and asked him to file a correct position of flood plains and the distances of the various projects. Meanwhile, ADA has been asked to produce the original records before the tribunal on the next date of hearing, Aug 19.
Floods & floodplains are integral part of a river eco-system. Both has essential role to play in smooth functioning of multiple ecological processes that takes place throughout the journey of a river. It is abused of floodplains that our cities are facing flood threats. It is surprising to see how govts have so far failed in protection of flood plain.
With incidents of excess rainfall, cloud burst & land slides happening at increased frequency, it is time to define our river zone and flood plain clearly in the own interest of human being.
Continue reading “DRP: 16 Aug 2016 (When shall We Start Respecting Our Rivers & Provide Space to Them)”
DRP: 8 August 2016 (Aug 06, ILR meeting is no dialogue)
SANDRP BLOG Aug 06, ILR meeting is no dialogue While dialogue is necessary and welcome in any democracy, the meeting that was organized on Aug 06 at Constitutional Club is certainly not the right step in almost every sense. We hope MoWR and those who gather at the constitution club today will deliberate on these issues and resolve to correct them before a dialogue can really begin on the issue of ILR, and in fact Rivers. SANDRP coordinator was invited at this meeting on ILR being held at Constitution Club at 4 pm today as a speaker, but have decided to decline the invite, as elaborated in the note here. Please help us spread the word. Feedback is welcome. As was expected, Minister Uma Bharti reiterated that the Ken Betwa Link project will be implemented, even though the project has none of the clearances as yet! The reporter should have mentioned that.
Continue reading “DRP: 8 August 2016 (Aug 06, ILR meeting is no dialogue)”
DRP: 1 August 2016 (Increasing Water Conflicts in Times of Surplus Monsoon)
INTER-STATE WATER DISPUTES
Center Meeting held to sort out Mahanadi issue Union Water Ministry on July 31 called a Meeting of representatives of Odisha & Chattisgarh Govts to consider the various water resources issues/projects in Mahanadi Basin. It was decided that the Central 
Water Commission would invariably ensure that the DPRs for the projects in Mahanadi basin which are appraised by it, are duly shared with the other riparian State and that the riparian State is given a period of 45 days to convey their views/comments on the project. It was also decided that the DPRs would be delivered to the Resident Commissioners of respective States and thereafter the representatives of the State would be invited to share their observations. The meeting was called in pursuance of the assurance given by Water Minister Uma Bharti in Parliament on July 26. Earlier, fearing that dams on river Mahanadi in Chhattisgarh would have adverse impact on Odisha, former union minister Jairam Ramesh has asked CM Naveen Patnaik to take up all party team to Delhi to raise the matter with the PM. He also said that Congress will send a delegation to Chhattisgarh in a week to study the sites where dam and barrages are proposed to be constructed. On the other hand, former CM Ajit Jogi having broken away from the Congress on July 25 attacked Congress over its opposition to Chhattisgarh’s plan to construct dams & barrages on Mahanadi river.
DRP: 18 July 2016 (Remove inefficient Farakka Barrage: Bihar CM)
Bihar CM demands removal of Farakka barrage CM Nitish Kumar on July 16 demanded removal of Farakka barrage on river Ganga, saying “the disadvantages of the barrage appear to be higher than its benefits”. Raising the issue of Bihar’s share in Ganges waters at the 11th Inter State Council meeting in New Delhi, Nitish also sought the Centre’s intervention to ensure uninterrupted flow of water from the states of upper co-basin so that the entire length of Ganga has continuous supply of water even during lean season. The meeting was chaired by PM Narendra Modi and attended by CMs of different states and union ministers. The CM also told the meeting that responsibility to ensure the required water availability at Farakka barrage has been put solely on Bihar. Presenting Bihar’s views Nitish further added that about 16% of the catchment area of river Ganga is in Bihar, but in the lean season 3/4th of the total water flowing in Ganga comes from rivers of Bihar. Estimated 400 cusecs of water flow is received at the Uttar Pradesh border of Bihar in river Ganga. However, at Farakka barrage, 1500 cusecs of water flow is to be ensured, which is achieved mainly through the water contributed by the rivers of Bihar. Indeed, during lean season, not even 400 cusecs of water flow is available at the border of Bihar. In this regard, Centre’s intervention is required to ensure uninterrupted flow of water from the states of upper co-basin, so that the entire length of Ganga river in Bihar has continuous supply of water even during lean season. Nitish also demanded formulation of an effective National Silt Management Policy, saying such a body at the national level is essential for silt management as well as for ensuring uninterrupted flow of water not only in Ganga, but all the other rivers.
Continue reading “DRP: 18 July 2016 (Remove inefficient Farakka Barrage: Bihar CM)”
SANDRP 